Skip navigation

Tag Archives: Customer Experience

Becomes More ‘Hands on’ With Better Search, Service, More Fixed Prices

How do you rejigger an $8 billion company to catch up to rising customer-experience expectations that have passed it by? That’s the task facing eBay.

ebay

In the 11 years since the dot-com darling went public, the e-commerce world grew up — but eBay looked stuck in its 1.0 past. Unlike Zappos, which built a name using customer service as marketing, and Amazon, where shoppers can log on and find virtually anything at a clear, set price, eBay didn’t control the fulfillment chain. That often leaves its customer service, a component key to branding, at the mercy of its sellers. Moreover, it was riddled with auctions, a type of transaction that has garnered less and less interest from the mainstream consumers who account for much of the $130 billion in annual online-shopping sales.

While the company’s marketplaces unit, which includes eBay.com, is in the middle of a three-year turnaround plan to fix those problems, “I doubt they can ever catch up totally [to competitors like Zappos and Amazon],” said Larry Witt, an analyst with Morningstar. “They can’t directly control the customer experience, though they can influence it.”

Yet that’s exactly what eBay has set out to do. It’s giving top buyers and sellers access to a phone service seven days a week and allowing them to submit queries online — a service being expanded throughout the holiday and 2010 to more sellers and buyers. It’s hired talent to improve its search-technology capabilities to make eBay more consumer-friendly and has begun incorporating user feedback more quickly. And it’s taking steps to add more fixed-price options for its customers.

It all adds up to what Lorrie Norrington, president of eBay marketplaces called “a sea change in customer service,” going from “an offline function to much more hands-on.”

Part of that charge is being led by Christopher Payne and Dane Glasgow, search technologists brought in from search startup Positronic, and Hugh Williams and Eric Brill, who arrived from Microsoft. They have reshaped the process in which eBay works: When you used to search eBay for an item, results would be listed by auction-expiration dates, with ones expiring soonest showing up first. Now, it’s taken a nod from Google, which pioneered the use of quality factors in its paid-search ranking system to improve the kinds of ads and offers people see.

Beyond auction
Today eBay search looks not only at auction end date but also rewards the stature of the seller, factoring in things that matter to buyers: the price of goods, the reputation of the seller and free shipping offers. The improved site functions, paired with a broader selection, will improve the overall experience, Ms. Norrington believes, which should actually end up cutting back on the need for customer service.

“You’re beginning to see some of the differences,” she said, of the upgrades eBay’s new tech-savvy hires are making. “It’s about making sure the buyers have great-quality sellers and items surface. It’s making sure the search experience is one suited to what the buyer is looking for.”

In order to increase the quality and variety of goods on its site, eBay has also lowered sellers’ fees and is focused on adding fixed-price options. Several years ago, the mix was 80% auction and 20% fixed-price sales. Today it is almost evenly split, and, in the future, eBay expects 70% to be fixed and only 30% auctioned.

Not all of these changes have rested well with sellers — an important and powerful constituency for the company. However, it has taken pains to communicate developments to sellers through e-mails, discussion boards, seller summits, web seminars, web radio Q&As and small group dinners.

“A lot of the changes were necessary. Hardcore eBay sellers are not happy with them, but they were necessary,” Mr. Witt said. “Take search, for example. You want to bring up products people are looking for. Delivering more-relevant results is the most important thing they had to attack.”

Positive results
And the changes, which have been communicated to consumers through a mix of events and media outreach, have instilled more confidence in the site. “There’s no question that eBay is safer than it was 18 months ago,” Ms. Norrington said. “Two big proof points are that our highest-quality sellers are growing substantially beyond e-commerce, up 14% in the second quarter in the U.S. And where we use a net promoter score, we’re seeing good results on trust and confidence. Our top buyers are buying more than ever.”

Wall Street is taking notice. In the past month, a number of Wall Street analysts have upgraded eBay’s stock. UBS, one of the firms issuing an upgrade, said that it believes the company’s marketplace business has “turned a corner.”

What you can learn

Remaking a business that’s as entrenched in the consumer psyche as eBay takes a lot of hard work, some risk-taking and a bit of chutzpah. Here, a few tips on how to tackle it.

Invest in talent. It’s a tough economy and eBay, like everyone else, is hurting. But that hasn’t stopped it from bringing in well-regarded tech talent.

Don’t be afraid to cut loose dead weight. Yes, eBay has angered and even lost some sellers, but the changes it’s making are rewarding its best sellers and best customers.

Look for partnerships that will upgrade your image. Teaming up with fashion icons Narciso Rodriguez and Normal Kamali on fixed-price lines instantly elevated eBay with the influential fashion crowd.

Don’t lose sight of the end customer. Both sellers and buyers are essential to eBay, so it added customer-service features to benefit both groups.

Communicate change consistently. To avoid seller confusion when it makes changes, eBay now rolls out changes twice a year, instead of on an ongoing basis. It gives sellers 60 days notice, and it reaches out in mass communications, as well as one on one.

I read some research  a few days ago from www.researchandmarkets.com which I reposted on Twitter yesterday. It talked about critical lessons in delivering a great customer experience, with one of them being that our brands are only as strong as their weakest link. Customer loyalty can disappear quickly with a single negative experience.

The research showed that consumers/customers may not frequently visit your brand’s web site, but once they do, a frustrating interaction can lead to a lost customer. Perhaps even more frightening is the opportunity to lose a customer at the call center, where too many companies in the study saw their experience ratings drop compared to other touch points. Yet the opportunity to strengthen the customer relationship exists along every step of the brand value chain, particularly when one step leads to another.

The study by researchandmarkets.com  showed that a positive call center interaction that includes an introduction to valuable online services can leave the consumer satisfied after that one call, but more engaged with the brand over time. A web site that helps customers navigate the instore shopping experience can pay brand dividends far beyond a satisfying online interaction.

The biggest challenge facing service organisations today is delivering a consistent customer experience. The amount of ways a customer can interface with the organisation has rapidly increased. There’s no system to ensure front line employees deliver the right experience every time. There is no skillset and toolset designed to efficiently deliver new and better services.

You may have the greatest product or service in the world, but if your customers are let down at any point in the chain, it’s all academic. Most companies I work with are extremely confused. They’ve tried everything they know, but it’s not working. Using a Service Design firm helps them figure out what it takes to succeed in profitably delivering a great customer experience.

This research by researchandmarkets.com piqued my interest and reinforced for me the value of Service Design and it’s contribution to ensuring that companies deliver a seamless and consistent customer experience for the purpose of creating, building and monetising Customer Loyalty. There are other types of companies that look to  create a “great customer experience”,  but more often than not, it is one or two isolated “customer experiences”. The more I examine successful Service Design case studies (both our own and others) I realise that it is the ability to deliver consistency across every touch-point  is the true and unique value that Service Design provides service based companies.

or visit Proto Partners here

Walk around any Shopping Mall in Australia and you will find it hard to find the stock for all the “on sale” and “40% off sale” signs that are plastered across retailers stores. The same goes for airlines, telecommunications and B2C and B2B organisations. Everyone is having to work much harder for the sale and are quickly resorting to price discounting to get their customers to buy from them.

In a recently published research report called “Customer Service Trumps Price,” 4,600 consumers were asked how they choose the companies they do business with across 12 mainstream industries.

In particular, it asked consumers to rate the importance of two criteria: good customer service and low prices. Here’s some of what was found when the data was analysed across five generations of consumers:

* Across all 12 industries (and every generation of consumers), good customer service was selected more frequently than low prices as being important.
* When it comes to the gap between good customer service and low prices, seven industries have double-digit spreads, led by banks (31%) and health insurance plans (18%).

Given nearly everyone has pulled or is close to pulling the price lever, this month I thought I would share with you an approach which is proven to reduce reliance on price discounting.

In a great 12 page mini-book written by Bruce Temkin who is the Vice President and Principal Analyst at the respected Forrester Research focusing on customer experience, he has used his extensive research to compile the 6 laws of customer experience.

1) Every interaction creates a personal reaction.
2) People are instinctively self-centred.
3) Customer familiarity breeds alignment.
4) Unengaged employees don’t create engaged customers.
5) Employees do what is measured, incented, and celebrated.
6) You can’t fake it.

While some isolated situations may not follow these 6 laws, they accurately describe the dynamics of customer experience for large organisations. Anyone looking to improve customer experience must understand and comply with these underlying realities.

With all companies challenged and marketing budgets cut back in this environment, keeping how to keep your customers (and keep them happy) is the key currency.

Whether you lead a service organisation or you are looking to find ways to add services to your product range to generate new opportunities for growth, if you are looking for ideas on how to improve your customer’s experience, I know you will find this article extremely valuable.

I think this is a fantastic article that demonstrates the power of using Big ‘D’ design for the purpose of growing your business using focus and well…..elegance.

What Your Company Needs: More Elegance
By Jessica Stillman
May 19th, 2009

* The Find: It’s usually a quality associated more with evening wear than management, but one expert is arguing that businesses should up their elegance quotient to succeed.

* The Source: An interview with Matthew E. May, the author of In Pursuit of Elegance: Why the Best Ideas Have Something Missing, conducted by blogger and venture capitalist Guy Kawasaki and published on the American Express Open Forum blog.

The Takeaway: Whether it’s a mission statement, a strategy, the formulation of a goal or a product design, May argues you should aim for elegance in your ideas. First things first, what exactly does he mean by the term? “Something is elegant if it is two things at once: unusually simple and surprisingly powerful. One without the other leaves you short of elegant,” he says. Great, so why is this quality so important?

Elegance cuts through the noise, captures our attention, and engages us. The point of elegance is to achieve the maximum impact with the minimum input. It’s a thoughtful, artful subtractive process focused on doing more and better with less.

Certainly it’s easier to remember an idea that’s short and punchy and minimalist products – think of all those little iPods nestled in everyone’s pocket or purse – certainly seem to earn consumers’ loyalty and love, but have other companies succeeded by focusing on elegance? May offers the surprising example of “freakishly popular” hamburger chain In N’ Out Burger – an establishment not usually associated with elegant dining. He explains:

The menu offers only five items: a hamburger, cheeseburger, double burger, French fries, and a short list of beverages. By keeping things simple, founder Harry Snyder says he is able to provide the highest quality food in a sparkling clean environment.

In ‘N Out understands that seduction, and that subtraction can simply mean “not adding.” By resisting formal menu expansion they’ve avoided the self-defeating overkill seen in consumer electronics, with its “feature creep,” and the resulting “feature fatigue.

Microsoft Word, famous for its seemingly endless features most users never needed nor wanted, is cited as a classic example of a feature fatigue inducing product, but how many managers have induced a similarly sleepy feelings in their teams by failing to reduce their aims down to a simple, streamlined and compelling idea and instead throwing a messy list of duties, goals and responsibilities at their employees?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 614 other followers