Skip navigation

Category Archives: Service Design

Becomes More ‘Hands on’ With Better Search, Service, More Fixed Prices

How do you rejigger an $8 billion company to catch up to rising customer-experience expectations that have passed it by? That’s the task facing eBay.

ebay

In the 11 years since the dot-com darling went public, the e-commerce world grew up — but eBay looked stuck in its 1.0 past. Unlike Zappos, which built a name using customer service as marketing, and Amazon, where shoppers can log on and find virtually anything at a clear, set price, eBay didn’t control the fulfillment chain. That often leaves its customer service, a component key to branding, at the mercy of its sellers. Moreover, it was riddled with auctions, a type of transaction that has garnered less and less interest from the mainstream consumers who account for much of the $130 billion in annual online-shopping sales.

While the company’s marketplaces unit, which includes eBay.com, is in the middle of a three-year turnaround plan to fix those problems, “I doubt they can ever catch up totally [to competitors like Zappos and Amazon],” said Larry Witt, an analyst with Morningstar. “They can’t directly control the customer experience, though they can influence it.”

Yet that’s exactly what eBay has set out to do. It’s giving top buyers and sellers access to a phone service seven days a week and allowing them to submit queries online — a service being expanded throughout the holiday and 2010 to more sellers and buyers. It’s hired talent to improve its search-technology capabilities to make eBay more consumer-friendly and has begun incorporating user feedback more quickly. And it’s taking steps to add more fixed-price options for its customers.

It all adds up to what Lorrie Norrington, president of eBay marketplaces called “a sea change in customer service,” going from “an offline function to much more hands-on.”

Part of that charge is being led by Christopher Payne and Dane Glasgow, search technologists brought in from search startup Positronic, and Hugh Williams and Eric Brill, who arrived from Microsoft. They have reshaped the process in which eBay works: When you used to search eBay for an item, results would be listed by auction-expiration dates, with ones expiring soonest showing up first. Now, it’s taken a nod from Google, which pioneered the use of quality factors in its paid-search ranking system to improve the kinds of ads and offers people see.

Beyond auction
Today eBay search looks not only at auction end date but also rewards the stature of the seller, factoring in things that matter to buyers: the price of goods, the reputation of the seller and free shipping offers. The improved site functions, paired with a broader selection, will improve the overall experience, Ms. Norrington believes, which should actually end up cutting back on the need for customer service.

“You’re beginning to see some of the differences,” she said, of the upgrades eBay’s new tech-savvy hires are making. “It’s about making sure the buyers have great-quality sellers and items surface. It’s making sure the search experience is one suited to what the buyer is looking for.”

In order to increase the quality and variety of goods on its site, eBay has also lowered sellers’ fees and is focused on adding fixed-price options. Several years ago, the mix was 80% auction and 20% fixed-price sales. Today it is almost evenly split, and, in the future, eBay expects 70% to be fixed and only 30% auctioned.

Not all of these changes have rested well with sellers — an important and powerful constituency for the company. However, it has taken pains to communicate developments to sellers through e-mails, discussion boards, seller summits, web seminars, web radio Q&As and small group dinners.

“A lot of the changes were necessary. Hardcore eBay sellers are not happy with them, but they were necessary,” Mr. Witt said. “Take search, for example. You want to bring up products people are looking for. Delivering more-relevant results is the most important thing they had to attack.”

Positive results
And the changes, which have been communicated to consumers through a mix of events and media outreach, have instilled more confidence in the site. “There’s no question that eBay is safer than it was 18 months ago,” Ms. Norrington said. “Two big proof points are that our highest-quality sellers are growing substantially beyond e-commerce, up 14% in the second quarter in the U.S. And where we use a net promoter score, we’re seeing good results on trust and confidence. Our top buyers are buying more than ever.”

Wall Street is taking notice. In the past month, a number of Wall Street analysts have upgraded eBay’s stock. UBS, one of the firms issuing an upgrade, said that it believes the company’s marketplace business has “turned a corner.”

What you can learn

Remaking a business that’s as entrenched in the consumer psyche as eBay takes a lot of hard work, some risk-taking and a bit of chutzpah. Here, a few tips on how to tackle it.

Invest in talent. It’s a tough economy and eBay, like everyone else, is hurting. But that hasn’t stopped it from bringing in well-regarded tech talent.

Don’t be afraid to cut loose dead weight. Yes, eBay has angered and even lost some sellers, but the changes it’s making are rewarding its best sellers and best customers.

Look for partnerships that will upgrade your image. Teaming up with fashion icons Narciso Rodriguez and Normal Kamali on fixed-price lines instantly elevated eBay with the influential fashion crowd.

Don’t lose sight of the end customer. Both sellers and buyers are essential to eBay, so it added customer-service features to benefit both groups.

Communicate change consistently. To avoid seller confusion when it makes changes, eBay now rolls out changes twice a year, instead of on an ongoing basis. It gives sellers 60 days notice, and it reaches out in mass communications, as well as one on one.

Kingston Estate. London UK

The Service Design Network has just released its second  Service Design Journal. A great issue which landed in my inbox last week. To get the full content you will need to sign up for the Service Design Network which is well worthwhile.
The second issue of Touchpoint, the sdn’s Service Design Journal, is out now! Entitled “Health and Service Design”, this brand-new issue features articles from Service Design and/or healthcare experts such as Julia Schaeper, Lynne Maher and Helen Baxter (NHS), Lavrans Løvlie (live|work), Ben Reason (live|work), Mark Mugglestone (NHS) and John-Arne Røttingen (Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services), Tine Park (Designit) and Christine Janae-Leoniak (Mayo Clinic) as well as interviews with representatives from these areas.

SDN Touchpoint

SDN Touchpoint

This issue of Touchpoint will explore the individual, social and economic relevance of health systems and the potential for of Service Design to redesign and reinvent service offerings, service processes and service interactions. If you would like more information on SDN Journal please click here

I thought this was a nice and short presentation on some of the useful techniques and processes in use at Proto Partners and other Service Design firms.

I read some research  a few days ago from www.researchandmarkets.com which I reposted on Twitter yesterday. It talked about critical lessons in delivering a great customer experience, with one of them being that our brands are only as strong as their weakest link. Customer loyalty can disappear quickly with a single negative experience.

The research showed that consumers/customers may not frequently visit your brand’s web site, but once they do, a frustrating interaction can lead to a lost customer. Perhaps even more frightening is the opportunity to lose a customer at the call center, where too many companies in the study saw their experience ratings drop compared to other touch points. Yet the opportunity to strengthen the customer relationship exists along every step of the brand value chain, particularly when one step leads to another.

The study by researchandmarkets.com  showed that a positive call center interaction that includes an introduction to valuable online services can leave the consumer satisfied after that one call, but more engaged with the brand over time. A web site that helps customers navigate the instore shopping experience can pay brand dividends far beyond a satisfying online interaction.

The biggest challenge facing service organisations today is delivering a consistent customer experience. The amount of ways a customer can interface with the organisation has rapidly increased. There’s no system to ensure front line employees deliver the right experience every time. There is no skillset and toolset designed to efficiently deliver new and better services.

You may have the greatest product or service in the world, but if your customers are let down at any point in the chain, it’s all academic. Most companies I work with are extremely confused. They’ve tried everything they know, but it’s not working. Using a Service Design firm helps them figure out what it takes to succeed in profitably delivering a great customer experience.

This research by researchandmarkets.com piqued my interest and reinforced for me the value of Service Design and it’s contribution to ensuring that companies deliver a seamless and consistent customer experience for the purpose of creating, building and monetising Customer Loyalty. There are other types of companies that look to  create a “great customer experience”,  but more often than not, it is one or two isolated “customer experiences”. The more I examine successful Service Design case studies (both our own and others) I realise that it is the ability to deliver consistency across every touch-point  is the true and unique value that Service Design provides service based companies.

or visit Proto Partners here

After working on Service Design projects for the past 12 months, I thought it was time to write an article on Service Design for a market(Australia) where Service Design is in its infancy when compared to most other professions and Service Design markets.

My intent was not to break new ground in the study of Service Design, more so to draw upon the knowledge that I have accumulated by both observing and practicing and provide those readers of Fast Thinking magazine (Australia’s answer to Fast Company ) with an easily understandable point of view on the value of Service Design. As the first article published on Service Design in this part of the world, it will be interesting to see the feedback.

You can download a copy of the article here

or visit Proto Partners here

at your service

I sourced this from the University of Cambridge paper titled Succeeding through service innovation published in April 2008. It is just a section from the beginning but i thought it was compelling. More so because it explains that although Services are not new in any way, the level of complexity attached to them has risen significantly, it is is this which is now challenging many organisations as they seek to compete with their competitors that have not only embraced the complexity, but also delivered it in a consistent  manner.
Growth in service

The growth of service activity across industries is now widely recognised. However, is it really anything new? Service is as old as the division of labour and has been provided in various forms since record keeping began. Indeed writing records was a form of service! What has changed, however, is the scale and complexity of service systems –configurations of resources that create and deliver value to stakeholders through service activities.
Service systems are growing rapidly and have become an ever greater part of value creation in modern economies. We are paying proportionally more for services in the form of experience, advice, information, assurance, infrastructure and leasing, and proportionally less on growing, building and owning physical goods. And more than ever before, we are constrained by natural resources and have to achieve the triple targets of effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability. The rise in complexity is partly due to the expansion of our values in social, ecological and political dimensions.

The full report can be accessed.here

or visit Proto Partners here

I have resisted the urge up to now, but at the end of long day visually mapping the methodology that we use at Proto Partners, I needed some slight escape. Here is my wordle map which does a good job of demonstrating our focus here at Proto Partners -  using  Service Design to help companies create services that deliver great experiences that improve company profitability.

ppwordle

The original in case someone would like it, is available here

or visit Proto Partners here

I know Obama fever has settled down somewhat, however standing for a positive change for not only America and the way it engaged with the rest of the world was long overdue and very welcome.

Even here in in Australia, there are millions of fans of Obama and his administration. As a business pioneering Service Design in Australia, I draw encouragement from his “YES WE CAN” cry, in fact, I have recreated it on my homepage of my Mac.

I was looking at the “CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN” poster the other day and decided to reformulate it for Service Design,  creating a “SERVICE CUSTOMERS ARE DELIGHTED BY” poster. I am not sure where I will use it and I don’t have any Service Design rallies that I am attending in the near future, but what the hell. The sentiment is right, we are all trying to delight our customers by providing world class and flawless service at every customer touchpoint. We are trying to delight them, thereby increasing their loyalty and their individual and collective profitability.

SERVICE WE ARE DELIGHTED BY

And the Original

the Pres

Let me know what you think?

or visit Proto Partners here

If it is possible to be in love with a Service Designer for what they say and what they contribute to the profession of Service Design, then I have to say I am pretty keen on Jennifer Bove(pronounced Bo-vey, which makes it all the better), a Principal at Kicker Studio in San Franciso.

I don’t know how old she is, but packed in however many years she has been on the planet is a rocket brain and a bucket of insight.For someone who said during her presentation(see link at end of the article) she didn’t have many answers, just lots of questions, she makes a lot of sense. Imagine what she is like when she provides some answers!!

Here is her article reprodcued from creativity-online.com. As always, she makes plenty of sense. If you are listening Jennifer, please keep it coming!!

Service Design

Service design, while often talked about in academia, is getting more and more attention from design companies and service providers, as the impact of experience design has been proven to increase customer satisfaction and brand perception.

By: Jennifer Bove Published: Jun 25, 2009

Jennifer Bove, Kicker Studio.
Jennifer Bove, Kicker Studio.

Last week I had the honor of participating in the final lecture night of the Dot Dot Dot series put on by the MFA in Interaction Design program at the School of Visual Arts. The series has been a big hit among the design crowd in NYC, each week featuring a different design topic and four short presentations from various related fields. Highlights have included themes such as “The Curators,” “The Influencers” and “The Interviewers, which can be found on the program’s Vimeo stream. The final evening’s theme was “The Service designers.”

Service design, while often talked about in academia, is getting more and more attention from design companies and service providers, as the impact of experience design has been proven to increase customer satisfaction and brand perception. This isn’t to say that service design is only about the customer’s experience; while that’s a big part of it, service designers also look at the delivery of the service, its operational efficiency, and its scalability from a design point of view. They focus on designing both the overall service, an intangible exchange like using a bank account or renting a car, and each of the touch points within the service, which may be tangible products like a bank statement, website or or rental car. Service designers map the way that a service is experienced over time and each of the interactions within the experience.

My co speakers at the event were Chenda Fruchter, who talked about designing NYC’s 311 service, ReD Associates’ Jun Lee, who recounted their research with Lego, and Silvia Harris, presenting her work redesigning the wayfinding services at New York Presbyterian Hospital.

I decided not to focus on a specific case study, but rather present a series of issues to keep in mind when thinking about the services we design. My talk, titled “Is there an app for that?” was about the challenge of designing services in today’s data-rich web-enabled world, and how our experiences online have changed our expectations of the way things work offline.

I focused on five topics. Here’s a brief summary of them:

Immediacy
The fact that I can get the answers to just about anything with a quick Google search or a lazy tweet has changed my appetite for instant gratification. I’m used to having access to everything in my smart phone now, and near real-time response in most of my communication. This can’t help but affect my expectations of offline services–I have have less patience for delays, and my perception of acceptable time lines and information access is skewed. Service designers need to think about what happens when things don’t go as planned, account for high levels of scrutiny around timeliness in a world where so much of our online experience is near real-time and 24/7.

Co-creation
Online services are all about participation. Many of our favorites, such as Wikipedia and YouTube, are crowd-sourced or co-created. They rely on users to create the content that others will consume. For these services to work, users have to participate. This co-creation model presents an opportunity for service designers as well. By involving users in the creation and implementation of a service, we can engender a sense of ownership and accountability that motivates them to participate, and makes them more likely to succeed.

Voice
Along with users’ participation comes their point of view. Websites such as Digg, Theadless and others capitalize on the opinions of the masses, giving users a place to express their preferences and see the impact of their opinions on what’s featured on the site. Many offline services have started using the web to a similar effect. Some use Get Satisfaction, an online service geared toward giving customers a neutral platform for communicating with companies, and many have started using Twitter as an official forum for customer service. Users now have new ways of expressing their opinions, an the public nature of this online expression can often lead to groundswell. These channels, aren’t going away, and can be incorporated into service delivery and quality assurance in new and interesting ways.

Expertise
Thanks to the internet, I’m a lot smarter than I used to be. I now have access to myriad experts, and quickly learn all I need to prepare myself for engaging with a service, and I can often find answers to my questions without ever dealing with an expert directly. The availability of expert information online changes my expectations of the the service providers I interact with–it’s easy to forget that people are not computers, nor have they memorized the contents therein. However knowledgeable a service provider may be, their differentiator is no longer exclusive access to information. But the opportunity lies in how they use the information and the human quality of their expertise. There’s a reason we still consult doctors instead of relying on WebMD.

Customization
One of the advantages of online services is that they can track user behavior and provide opportunities for customization. People have become accustomed to their own versions of iGoogle, and saving things like their online grocery lists from one week to the next. How does an offline service reflect the ongoing nature of a service relationship? How does it learn from a user’s behavior? Does it respond differently at different points in the service experience?

There are many, many more issues that I could add to this list, but the talk was only 10 minutes long. Exploring this topic left me wondering whether or not there “should” be an app for everything under the sun. What are the qualities that we want to preserve in a world were everything is data? How can we design better services that address a new set of expectations from our users?

You can see a video of the talk on the UX network, and I’ve posted the slides on slideshare as well.

***

Jennifer Bove is a founder and principal at Kicker Studio in San Francisco and on the faculty of the School of Visual Art’s Interaction Design MFA department in New York. She travels, a lot.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 526 other followers